Glenn Greenwald - The Reality-Based Community

Update

Oh, well. As Churchill didn’t quite say, “An occasional meal of one’s own words is part of a healthy, balanced diet.”

In my eyes Joy Ann Reid is still head and shoulders above her nasty, small-minded accusers. But it’s now hard to deny that she was wrong on the facts. Her graceful apology doesn’t leave much room for doubt.

So if - as I still believe, based on the testimony of those who know her well - Reid is fundamentally honest, how are we to make sense of her conduct?

As Richard Kim points out in a must-read essay, attitudes have shifted so far and so fast that it’s entirely possible for someone to have written something in 2007 and find it unthinkable today. If you write a lot, you forget about a lot of what you write. When I read my own blogging from back then - even stuff I still agree with entirely and that I’m proud to claim - I mostly don’t recall having written it.

Maybe that’s what happened to Reid. Memory isn’t a record of events, it’s a story we tell ourselves. And sometimes it turns out the story has an unreliable narrator.

Nietzsche nailed it:

Memory says, “I did that.”

Pride replies, “I could not have done that.”

Eventually … memory yields.

Original post

Continue reading “Joy Ann Reid and the tyranny of technical expertise”

Mark informs me that this Thursday he will be “with Glenn Greenwald on bloggingheads tv on drugs”. I have told him this is a bad idea and it would make more sense to take the drugs afterwards, but still, he’s his own man so there it is. Let me contribute something in advance nonetheless. Many policy people have asked me what I think of the Cato Institute’s report on Portugal “proving that drug legalization works”, which Greenwald authored. Below is the guts of the memo I have written for such decision makers, which expresses my doubts about the report’s standing as a serious piece of drug policy analysis. If you like your drug policy simple and ideological, save yourself some time and skip straight to the comments section to denounce me. But if you want to know how analysts and decision makers try to sort through drug policy in all its complexity, you may find the following of interest. Extra credit reading is this concrete example for how you can torture the statistics of Portuguese drug policy until they give you the answer you want.

***
This memo is to follow up on your request for some analysis of the Cato Institute’s report on Portuguese drug policy. To summarize my view briefly, I think some aspects of current Portuguese drug policy are useful, that all of it warrants even-handed evaluation and that the Cato Report does summarize a selection of the important facts about the policy’s impact. I do however have some reservations about how the report has been interpreted as well as how it was written. Continue reading “Cato Institute’s Report on Portuguese Drug Policy: Reasons for Skepticism”

Topic Areas