Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
“No questions from journalists about climate change in 2016 presidential debates???”
Author: Harold Pollack
Harold Pollack is Helen Ross Professor of Social Service Administration at the University of Chicago. He has served on three expert committees of the National Academies of Science. His recent research appears in such journals as Addiction, Journal of the American Medical Association, and American Journal of Public Health. He writes regularly on HIV prevention, crime and drug policy, health reform, and disability policy for American Prospect, tnr.com, and other news outlets. His essay, "Lessons from an Emergency Room Nightmare" was selected for the collection The Best American Medical Writing, 2009. He recently participated, with zero critical acclaim, in the University of Chicago's annual Latke-Hamentaschen debate.
View all posts by Harold Pollack
4 thoughts on ““No questions from journalists about climate change in 2016 presidential debates???””
But her emails….
Say, "emails," again, ************. I dare you. I double dare you.
There should have been, and every journalist who moderated or commented on the debates without bringing the subject up bears the shame of that failure. However, I doubt that the candidates' responses to questions about climate change would have done anything for Clinton's side of the ledger, particularly among the 70K voters that made the difference. People who imagine that the presence of snow in winter disproves climate change-and who think that someone like Sen. Imhofe, who considers a snowball an unanswerable argument is just the sort of person they want representing their interests in Washington-would just have moved further into the Trump column.
Regardless, it was a massive and disgraceful failure of American journalism.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
But her emails….
Say, "emails," again, ************. I dare you. I double dare you.
There should have been, and every journalist who moderated or commented on the debates without bringing the subject up bears the shame of that failure. However, I doubt that the candidates' responses to questions about climate change would have done anything for Clinton's side of the ledger, particularly among the 70K voters that made the difference. People who imagine that the presence of snow in winter disproves climate change-and who think that someone like Sen. Imhofe, who considers a snowball an unanswerable argument is just the sort of person they want representing their interests in Washington-would just have moved further into the Trump column.
Regardless, it was a massive and disgraceful failure of American journalism.
Inexcusable.