Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
Look! Over there!
The pope warns against “atheist extremism.”
Days after a Church-appointed commission found cases of sexual abuse of children - typically starting around the age of twelve - in nearly every diocese and every Church-run religious school in Belgium, the Pope went to England and warned against “atheist extremism” that, he said, posed a threat to “those traditional values and cultural expressions that more aggressive forms of secularism no longer value or even tolerate.” Â It’s a good thing all those child-molesting priests, and the bishops who covered up for them, were men of faith; think how badly they might have behaved had they been atheists.
Author: Mark Kleiman
Professor of Public Policy at the NYU Marron Institute for Urban Management and editor of the Journal of Drug Policy Analysis. Teaches about the methods of policy analysis about drug abuse control and crime control policy, working out the implications of two principles: that swift and certain sanctions don't have to be severe to be effective, and that well-designed threats usually don't have to be carried out.
Books:
Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know (with Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken)
When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment (Princeton, 2009; named one of the "books of the year" by The EconomistAgainst Excess: Drug Policy for Results (Basic, 1993)
Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control (Greenwood, 1989)
UCLA HomepageCurriculum Vitae
Contact: Markarkleiman-at-gmail.com
View all posts by Mark Kleiman
6 thoughts on “Look! Over there!”
You're being too kind to him. He actually said that the Atheist extremism raised the specter of Nazism, which besides being a Godwin's Law violation is a topic this Pope in particular might do well to avoid, given his personal expertise on the subject. It's not for nothing that people call him Ratzi The Rhyming Slang - heck, given the absolutist conservatism he professes and his decades cracking down on progressive voices in the Church, it's not just because of his boyhood.
The other interesting declaration connected with the Papal visit was the cardinal who said that passing through Heathrow reminded him of visiting a third-world country. Amazingly, his official spokesperson explained this by saying his boss "was merely highlighting Britain's multi-ethnic makeup". Which means he wasn't complaining about bad infrastructure or overbearing officials: he's just incredibly racist.
"think how badly they might have behaved had they been atheists."
One simple question, what is "bad"?
Bux:
Diddling little children is bad.
Covering up for your colleagues who are diddling little children because you're afraid of scandal or liability lawsuits is bad.
Blaming the whole thing on "homosexuals" is bad.
For that matter, burning heretics and witches was pretty bad. So was chattel slavery. So is torture.
And I don't need any metaphysical mumbo-jumbo to be able to say so. And as far as I can tell, the folks who claim they know right from wrong because God or the Church told them so have a worse-than-average record of getting it right.
ok, when I ask "what is bad", I don't mean what things are bad. I mean how do you determine what is bad. Is diddling little childen bad because you say so Mark? Is diddling little children bad because 90% of civil society at this moment in time thinks so? You claim you need no metaphysical mumbo-jumbo to be able to say so, but what then do you draw upon to be able to say so? Call it "metaphysical mumbo-jumbo" if you will, but it's an unavoidably honest question to ask.
As far as the track record of theists compared to atheists, I'll put their record up any day against the staunchest atheists. But since you throw out a mathematical term ("worse-than-average"), where is quantifiable evidence to support this assertion. You make a fallicy of logic by overlooking contrary examples and focusing on supporting examples in favor of your pre-disposed position. So let's see some hard evidence. Maybe we can start by quantifying by some factor such as how many human beings have died at the hands of atheists vs. theists throughout history, starting with atheists like Hitler and Stalin.
Really Bux. You want to play that game? So as far as you are concerned the horrors of colonialism are just so much liberal whining? As far as you are concerned, nothing much important happened in the Americas after the Spanish arrived apart from their being introduced to Jesus? The Belgian Congo was all just a minor labor dispute? The post-British Indian famines (or, heck, Irish famines) were just some folks complaining about being forced to go on diet? Ever heard of the 30 years war and the death rates involved?
Or, wait, don't tell me — all those people, no matter what they said about being driven by god were not REALLY driven by religious impulses.
"how do you determine what is bad."
By reading selected passages from religious texts that my friends all tell me are authoritative?
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
You're being too kind to him. He actually said that the Atheist extremism raised the specter of Nazism, which besides being a Godwin's Law violation is a topic this Pope in particular might do well to avoid, given his personal expertise on the subject. It's not for nothing that people call him Ratzi The Rhyming Slang - heck, given the absolutist conservatism he professes and his decades cracking down on progressive voices in the Church, it's not just because of his boyhood.
The other interesting declaration connected with the Papal visit was the cardinal who said that passing through Heathrow reminded him of visiting a third-world country. Amazingly, his official spokesperson explained this by saying his boss "was merely highlighting Britain's multi-ethnic makeup". Which means he wasn't complaining about bad infrastructure or overbearing officials: he's just incredibly racist.
"think how badly they might have behaved had they been atheists."
One simple question, what is "bad"?
Bux:
Diddling little children is bad.
Covering up for your colleagues who are diddling little children because you're afraid of scandal or liability lawsuits is bad.
Blaming the whole thing on "homosexuals" is bad.
For that matter, burning heretics and witches was pretty bad. So was chattel slavery. So is torture.
And I don't need any metaphysical mumbo-jumbo to be able to say so. And as far as I can tell, the folks who claim they know right from wrong because God or the Church told them so have a worse-than-average record of getting it right.
ok, when I ask "what is bad", I don't mean what things are bad. I mean how do you determine what is bad. Is diddling little childen bad because you say so Mark? Is diddling little children bad because 90% of civil society at this moment in time thinks so? You claim you need no metaphysical mumbo-jumbo to be able to say so, but what then do you draw upon to be able to say so? Call it "metaphysical mumbo-jumbo" if you will, but it's an unavoidably honest question to ask.
As far as the track record of theists compared to atheists, I'll put their record up any day against the staunchest atheists. But since you throw out a mathematical term ("worse-than-average"), where is quantifiable evidence to support this assertion. You make a fallicy of logic by overlooking contrary examples and focusing on supporting examples in favor of your pre-disposed position. So let's see some hard evidence. Maybe we can start by quantifying by some factor such as how many human beings have died at the hands of atheists vs. theists throughout history, starting with atheists like Hitler and Stalin.
Really Bux. You want to play that game? So as far as you are concerned the horrors of colonialism are just so much liberal whining? As far as you are concerned, nothing much important happened in the Americas after the Spanish arrived apart from their being introduced to Jesus? The Belgian Congo was all just a minor labor dispute? The post-British Indian famines (or, heck, Irish famines) were just some folks complaining about being forced to go on diet? Ever heard of the 30 years war and the death rates involved?
Or, wait, don't tell me — all those people, no matter what they said about being driven by god were not REALLY driven by religious impulses.
"how do you determine what is bad."
By reading selected passages from religious texts that my friends all tell me are authoritative?