Update Gallup comes in with Thurs-Sun poll: Romney 49 - Obama 48 among LVs; Obama 49 Romney 46 among RVs; Obama job approval now 52-45. The last pre-Sandy poll had Romney up by 5, which made Gallup an outlier. Maybe these numbers were goosed just a little to help Gallup climb down from that limb, or maybe this reflects real movement toward Obama since the storm, consistent with other polling. This won’t stop Republican fantasists from dreaming of a “hidden wave” election, but it removes the last bit of evidence of a Romney lead.
Obama back up to +4.5 in the RAND panel, now 50%-45.5%, after factoring in a 5-point intensity gap.
Obama winning Latinos by 50 points, a much bigger margin than he had four years ago and a somewhat bigger margin than shown in most of the big national polls. For example, Pew has Obama 50-47 overall, 66-27 among Latinos, who make up 7% of the sample. The difference between a 50-point spread and a 39-point spread, applied to 7% of the population, would increase Obama’s overall margin by eight-tenths of a percentage point. If that’s typical, then the 2.1% popular-vote margin now projected by Nate Silver should be nearly 3%.
*Unless Gallup decides to post again.
Great news. But-I follow far too many polling sites, but am at a loss as to what “nati-45” means. Enlighten us?
Great news. However-though I follow far too many polling sites, I am at a loss as to what “nati-45” means. Enlighten us?
Why Romney Might Boost Growth More Than Obama
By Matthew Yglesias | Posted Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, at 11:07 AM ET
Not a word in this post from Matt Yglesias — whom Mark has adored — about what other harms, other than reversing Roe v. Wade, a Romney-packed Supreme Court might do. Not a word about the horrible lies Romney has told in an attempt to seize power undemocratically. Not a word about the efforts of Mitt’s Republican party to disenfranchise millions of American voters.
Americans have fought and died to protect our democracy, Matt. But hardly a peep from you about Romney’s horribly mendacious lies.
Perhaps it’s because Matt is young, but for whatever reason, he can’t seem to see the dangerous man lurking behind the not-very-subtle mask Romney puts up. Matt says he’ll vote Obama, but at this point I’m not sure I believe him.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/11/05/which_candidate_is_better_for_short_term_growth_probably_mitt_romney.html#article_comment_box
Matt was definitely “young” when he started blogging at age 21 ten years ago. But how long do you get to be “young”? He’s a 31 year-old married man and homeowner now.
Matt learned his economics from Gregory Mankiw, and is a hardcore neoliberal.
Clarifying: I believe Matt when he says he’s voting Obama, but there are gradations of belief.
Here’s more discussion of Matt Yglesias’ whack post about growth under Romney.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2012/11/05/vote-your-pocketbook/