While you’all were doing whatever day-job you do between tweets, I was stimulating the economy and reducing health disparities: almost effortlessly. With two vitreous detachments, one of which took a morsel of retina with it, a budding cataract, macular changes, and astigmatism, I’m doing my part for Obama 2012 by supporting the ophthalmological economy. I’ve accomplished most of this using only the inside of my left eyeball. For the life of me I don’t understand why the Obama administration and Ben Bernanke can’t finish the job.
This ongoing experience leaves me with some mundane thoughts…
First, one has to applaud the routine excellence of the medical care enterprise. I have a laundry list of vision worries. Yet it’s corrected to near normal and will probably remain so for years. I can see fine to drive. So far the only real issues arise with reading my iPhone and making many more annoying typos in emails. I’ve been fortunate to work near major academic medical centers with good eye care. The retinal hole was fixed two hours after the injury in a blaze of purple light through (apparently beautifully-executed) laser surgery at Michigan’s Kellogg eye center. The hole is outside the visual field. So that issue is done. My cataract will eventually be resolved through lens replacement, after which I will probably see better than I have since I was nine years old.
Second, my direct medical care costs have been modest because I have good insurance. Blue Cross Blue Shield has always covered everything, with occasional manageable copayment. On the other hand, my eyeglasses are absurdly expensive. For precisely this reason I dallied about getting expensive sunglasses, which apparently has accelerated my difficulties.
Of course low-income people face greater issues, and are thus more likely to put important things off. Vision care was one of the major services with appreciable demand elasticities in the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Ninety percent of people in the free care arm with self-described vision issues received eye care. Only 76 percent of the people in the cost-sharing arm did so.  Among low-income respondents, 78 percent of people in the free plan, but only 59 percent of people in the cost-sharing plans had eye exams. Low-income people in the free plan were markedly more likely to get corrective glasses, and were therefore, on average, able to see better. Â
I’ve said and written critical things about Amazon and Walmart. I don’t disown these comments. Yet there is a real need for people of modest means to get decent commodity eyeglasses at a reasonable price through an efficient distribution channel.
Third, this modest health challenge leads me to appreciate from a distance the tenacity of people who have more to worry about. I periodically get my pupils dilated, and have someone shine a bright light in my eyes for several minutes examining my optical innards. No one cuts, pokes, or prods. The bright lights are deployed for only a few minutes. Yet I’m embarrassed to admit that I find the experience quite aversive. Aside from my eyes, I have been fortunate in my physical infrastructure. I’ve had the occasional ER visit as a kid. Aside from one broken bone I have never been really sick. I have never experienced a painful illness or traumatic surgery. I’ve never been pregnant. I’m surrounded by millions of brave and tenacious people all around me.Â
Finally, my eye issues produce some discomfiting thoughts about life planning. Like many academics on this list, my implicit retirement plan is to drag myself into the classroom well into my ‘70’s, sometime close to 2040. I’ve always figured that the usual age-related physical infirmity and mild slowdown in CPU speed shouldn’t stop me from walking into the classroom and droning on about Charles Murray and welfare policy.Â
As the crush of email becomes more burdensome to process, I realize that my eye difficulties might eventually change that personal calculation. Many of us evaluate policy issues such as Social Security retirement age through a lens of relative youth and vitality as we work our physically undemanding jobs. Of course you never really know.
I agree totally about the excellence of modern medical care.
About eight years ago I was diagnosed with a cholesteatoma (a benign growth) in my left middle ear after an audiology exam and a visit to an EMT. The growth was in the process of chewing up those three little bones in the middle ear and damaging the eardrum, causing (at that time) moderate hearing loss. The kicker is that, left untreated, the growth has a pretty fair probability of invading the cranium and causing a potentially life-threatening case of meningitis.
I understand that in years past surgery to remove the growth amounted to pretty much cleaning out everything in the middle ear, leaving one completely deaf in that ear. Now, microsurgery allows the surgeon to remove the growth, replace the three bones with plastic bits, and rebuild the eardrum, leaving me with near-normal hearing.
I’ll also second the comments about health insurance. In my case I’m insured through HAP (a Detroit-area HMO), and while I have to stay in network for treatment, I have free choice among all of the mega-hospital (Henry Ford, Beaumont, St Johns-Mercy, etc.) networks in the Detroit area. Once the problem was diagnosed the surgery was scheduled and the costs were covered, no questions asked. I shudder to think of what an uninsured person would do when confronted with paying five figures for surgery to correct a problem that’s not immediately life-threatening.
“Many of us evaluate policy issues such as Social Security retirement age through a lens of relative youth and vitality as we work our physically undemanding jobs. Of course you never really know.”
I disagree, and sharply. The *elites* worry about this. The other 90% of use have to deal with a job market which can take us or leave us after age 50. This is where I really want to reach through the screen and b*tchslap various pundits, who are in secure jobs for life (so long as they don’t go actually leftist).
Word.
Two vitreous detachments in three months have suddenly rendered my “physically undemanding job” somewhat more challenging. Sitting in front of two 24-inch high-def monitors all day now involves multiple black, jagged lines in both eyes “floating” across the screens. (When people said “floaters” I had in mind a much more benign experience.) I’ll be 63 next month and my implicit retirement plan had been to work until they force me out and then retreat with a bottle of Scotch and a shotgun (a la Ederoso); I expected that to be in 10-15-20 years. If that event now occurs in 3-5-7 years, it’s a whole ‘nother ballgame. Even those of us currently blessed with good insurance and good working conditions will be jarred (understatement) by the advance of age and the lack of support this society furnishes any of us.
Barry: I think the “us” referred to “elite pundits”, not “Americans.”
Dr Pollack: speaking of Amazon and eyeglasses, have you checked out sites like Zenni Optical? They’ve done a great job with glasses for me at like $30/pair.
I will do so….. Thanks for the tip.