Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Founded by Mark Kleiman (1951-2019)
- by telling all to the Emperor’s stormtroopers with no legal authority from anybody? Henry Farrell at Crooked Timber, who knows a lot about privacy policy, thinks probably yes.
Dammit, this means ME - and the same realization is dawning on all those Essex Tory Daily Mail readers on the Costas. The Atlantic just got another league wider. (Update: unfortunately I have no evidence for wider expat outrage, see comments)
Comments are closed.
Asal mula web Judi Poker Online Mengelokkan dipercaya di Dunia.
Dari segi buku Foster’ s Complete Hoyle, RF Foster menyelipkan “ Permainan situs pokerqq paling dipercaya dimainkan mula-mula di Amerika Serikat, lima kartu bikin masing masing pemain dari satu antaran kartu berisi 20 kartu”. Tetapi ada banyaknya ahli tarikh yg tidak setuju diantaranya David Parlett yg menguatkan jika permainan situs judi poker online paling dipercaya ini mirip seperti permainan kartu dari Persia yang dibawa oleh As-Nas. Kurang lebih sejahrawan menjelaskan nama produk ini diambil dari Poca Irlandi adalah Pron Pokah atau Pocket, tetapi masih menjadi abu-abu karena tidak dijumpai dengan pasti sapa yg menjelaskan permainan itu menjadi permainan poker.
Walau ada sisi per judian dalam semua tipe permainan ini, banyak pakar menjelaskan lebih jelas berkaitan gimana situs judi poker mampu menjadi game taruhan yang disenangi beberapa orang dalam Amerika Serikat. Itu berjalan bertepatan dengan munculnya betting di daerah sungai Mississippi dan daerah sekelilingnya pada tahun 1700 an serta 1800 an. Pada saat itu mungkin serius tampil terdapatnya keserupaan antara poker masa lalu dengan modern poker online tidak hanya pada trick berspekulasi tetapi sampai ke pikiran di tempat. Mungkin ini lah cikal akan munculnya permainan poker modern yg kalian ketahui sampai saat tersebut.
Riwayat awal timbulnya situs judi poker paling dipercaya Di dalam graha judi, salon sampai kapal-kapal yg siapkan arena betting yg ada didaerah setengah Mississippi, mereka terkadang bermain cukup hanya manfaatkan 1 dek yg beberapa 20 kartu (seperti permainan as-nas). Game itu terkadang dimainkan langsung tidak dengan diundi, langsung menang, punya putaran taruhan, dapat meningkatkan perhitungan taruhan seperi game as-nas.
Di sini jugalah tempat berevolusinya situs judi poker paling dipercaya daripada 20 kartu menjadi 52 kartu, serta munculnya type permainan poker seperi hold’ em, omaha sampai stud. Herannya orang melihat bila poker stud jadi poker pertama dan classic yang telah dimainkan lebih daripada 200 tahun.
Diakhir tahun 1800 an sajian Poker Online mulai disematkan lagi ketentuan baru diantaranya straight dan flush serta beberapa type tipe yang lain lain seperti tipe poker low ball, wild cards, community cards of one mode dan lainnya.
"…and the same realization is dawning on all those Essex Tory Daily Mail readers on the Costas"
Could you please post a link? For recreational value, if nothing else. It's fun to watch right-wingers realize that they aren't in on the con, that they are part of the conned, along with us.
Hum. I spoke too soon - wishful thinking base don Henry Farrwell's Irish Times link. The BBC reported the item but the story hasn't run on. Of the right-wing British press, the Telegraph did (in a David Rennie column http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/davidrennie/… criticising the European press reaction) but I can't find anything on the Express and Mail sites. The German tabloid Dild Zeitung did, here. http://www.bild.t-online.de/BTO/news/aktuell/2006…
The Financial Times coverage doesn't count here.
I think I'll have to withdraw the post in a couple of hours as materially wrong. Sorry.
Offending assertion withdrawn by an update. I've left the post, as the link to Farrell is very worthwhile.
Sorry, I didn't mean to criticize. I genuinely wanted to read some of the howls of pain, for amusement. I figure that, if the right wants to play quasi-dictatorial games, that they're fair game whenever they find themselves on the receiving end.
Don't apologise! While one of the dangers of blogging is shooting from the hip, one of its countervailing merits is the possibility of rapid correction of mistakes; and a mistake is mistake, whether it's pointed out by a hostile critic or a friendly commenter like you.
I still think the SWIFT episode is damaging. Increasing friction over data protection is one cost, as Farrell points out. He doesn't go into the dangers of Bush' lawlessness to cross-border cooperation between cops and between prosecutors. This only partly depends on treaties; more important is mutual confidence between professionals. To cut through red tape on say an arrest warrant, a cop needs to feel confidence that her/his opposite number is playing by similar rules, and would bend them only to a similar extent. If the US is perceived as having thrown the rule-book away, and it clearly has, cooperation is bound to be chilled. It's taken a long time to get working international cooperation over money laundering. The Bush damage won't be put right in a day.