Archive for the ‘Republican Party’ Category
August 13th, 2012
by Jonathan Zasloff
Really. I came across this report from Politico a few weeks ago, and it seemed to sum things up well. The House Agriculture Committee was debating the farm bill, and particularly Republicans’ efforts to decimate the Food Stamp program. Rep. Joe Baca (D-California) protested: As a young father, Rep. Joe Baca had himself relied on [...]
Posted: Monday, August 13th, 2012 at
12:00 pm
42 Comments »
August 9th, 2012
by Jonathan Zasloff
My friend and colleague Steve Bainbridge is out with a new article on “Corporate Lawyers as Gatekeepers,” which, if you are interested in corporate law, you should read (Steve is one of the country’s most distinguished scholars in the field). But what piqued my interest when he sent it to me was his offhand remark [...]
Posted: Thursday, August 9th, 2012 at
5:47 pm
80 Comments »
July 26th, 2012
by Jonathan Zasloff
In the last three days, Mitt Romney and his campaign have: 1) At best lied about and at worst divulged confidential conversations with the Australian foreign minister; 2) Been unable to distinguish “Russia” from “the Soviet Union”; 3) Used crude racial/ethnic stereotyping that even the Torygraph thinks is over-the-top; and now 4) Insulted Great Britain [...]
Posted: Thursday, July 26th, 2012 at
10:24 am
17 Comments »
July 18th, 2012
by Andrew Sabl
A few months ago I argued that one reason Republicans handled the contraception issue so incompetently was that public opinion on premarital sex was strongly divided by age and party: older Republicans, and nobody else, overwhelmingly regard sex outside marriage as inherently wrong. Mitt Romney has a similar problem regarding Bain. According to a Gallup [...]
Posted: Wednesday, July 18th, 2012 at
11:14 am
15 Comments »
July 17th, 2012
by Harold Pollack
Glenn and I discuss what Romney should have said to the NAACP, the extent that GOP candidates should acknowledge previous misdeeds such as the Southern Strategy, and other matters. I do want to note one correction, where I was unfair to Barry Goldwater. He opposed civil rights legislation and believed there was a constitutional basis [...]
Posted: Tuesday, July 17th, 2012 at
3:30 pm
15 Comments »
July 8th, 2012
by Kelly Kleiman
Category:
Barack Obama,
Birth Control,
Campaign 2012,
Constitutional politics,
Elections 2010 and 2012,
Illinois,
Immigration,
Language and usage,
Lying in politics,
Republican Party,
Rhetoric and Framing,
Stimulus,
Teaching,
Vote Casting and Counting
When I was in the eighth grade I had Mr. Nadrowski for science, and one day he called Stephen Chilcote up to the front of the class and told him to push against the cinder-block wall until it fell over. As Chiclet obediently pushed and the rest of us watched, Mr. Nadrowski kept up a [...]
Posted: Sunday, July 8th, 2012 at
4:51 pm
Tags: economy, Obama, Republican, unemployment, work
4 Comments »
July 6th, 2012
by Kelly Kleiman
Category:
Barack Obama,
Campaign 2012,
Democratic Party,
Economics,
Elections 2010 and 2012,
Labor,
Lying in politics,
Politics and Leadership,
Republican Party,
Rhetoric and Framing,
Stimulus,
Unemployment,
Watching Conservatives
Though he attracted ridicule from the Right for saying it (and what could he say that wouldn’t attract ridicule from the Right?), the President is correct: the private sector is okay, creating jobs at a respectable clip. The weakness in job creation comes primarily from the public sector, where states and municipalities are firing teachers [...]
Posted: Friday, July 6th, 2012 at
9:32 am
6 Comments »
June 26th, 2012
by James Wimberley
Posted: Tuesday, June 26th, 2012 at
7:36 am
31 Comments »
May 3rd, 2012
by Michael O'Hare
…was recruited to the Romney campaign as an expert in national security - this means Romney’s team thought he was the best person for the job (did I mention, the job is national security?) - and has plausible credentials in the field. Mitt Romney let his gay-bashers run him out of town without a peep, [...]
Posted: Thursday, May 3rd, 2012 at
6:12 pm
9 Comments »
March 26th, 2012
by Jonathan Zasloff
Well, when a politically ambitious appellate judge wants to avoid getting himself in trouble. Via Washington Monthly, SCOTUSBlog makes it clear that the Supremes might not even consider the so-called merits of the so-called constitutional questions regarding the Affordable Care Act. That’s because of an old (but still important) federal law called the Anti-Injunction Act, [...]
Posted: Monday, March 26th, 2012 at
10:26 am
18 Comments »