The treaty Barack Obama just signed with Dmitri Medvedev, and the strategy statement that went with it, are impeccably sensible. Fox News runs footage of mushroom cloulds while Newt Gingrich lies through his teeth about what’s in the statement. The mainstream media sits on its hands, and only Jon Stewart does the job of an actual journalist.
Archive for the ‘Nuclear proliferation’ Category
What do we make of an amateur nuclear bomb scientist riding around with a cheesy replica of the Hiroshima bomb? One thing is clear: he should find a new hobby.
The LHC doomsday scenario and similar risks.
Any ignoramus knows that, if we have to attack al-Qaeda bases in Pakistan, we shouldn’t use nukes. And any sophisticated strategic analyst agrees. But a little learning is a dangerous thing, and reporters and politicians who know just enough strategic theory to get it completely wrong are ganging up on Barack Obama for saying something that’s obviously correct.
Musharraf is going down. We backed a thug, and all we got is this lousy reputation.
Shouldn’t the design of American foreign policy toward Iran start with an analysis of Iranian politics? Increasing the chances that Iran has a new President less crazy and less hostile than its current one ought to be at the top of our priority list. But that’s not the way foreign policy gets thought about.
The U.S. and Russia are still in “launch-on-warning” mode, and Russian’s warning systems have been degrading over time.
The North Koreans tested a real warhead, not just a device, with an intended yield of about four kilotons. It fizzled. The tactical goal of the test was to make our aircraft carriers insecure, forcing them to keep away from the Korean coast. The strategic goal of the whole exercise is to get the U.S. to promise not to invade. From that perspective, the test was probably a mistake.
Latest substance on Iran: no nukes for a long time. Latest politics: Just say “No.” And repeat. And repeat.