Could we possibly have high-school kids play sports with lower concussion risk than football? (And ban the "header" in scholastic soccer, or require shock-absorbing helmets?)
No, I suppose we couldn't. Never mind.
But if high-school football were a drug, it would be in Schedule I. NIDA has spent approximately a gazillion dollars looking for evidence of lasting cognitive deficits from pot-smoking, and found nothing nearly as clear-cut as the risks associated with concussion, which is a fairly routine risk of playing football under current rules.
Just sayin'.
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)