OK, one last post on Dutch velocipedal culture, because another reader reminded me of what may its most remarkable convention: no helmets! This one is really perplexing. Obviously, the only people who should wear a bicycle helmet are those who (i) use their heads for thinking or (ii) wish to appear as though they do; many Dutch people meet one...
I received a lot of interesting mail in response to my speculations about the Dutch and their bicycles. Some important points, though the writers do not all agree with each other: A. Commuting and errands are done at a leisurely pace over fairly short distances; that, with the flatness of the country really does make a good bike (in the...
No judge should have a financial stake in the outcome of a case. A prosecutor acts in a quasi-judicial capacity. Therefore prosecutors shouldn't be paid for the number of cases they handle. But the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles is doing just that.
As is well known, the Dutch have an extensive, pervasive, and very green bicycle habit. Big cities have four completely separate surface circulation systems with integrated signals (cars, pedestrians, trams, and bikes); tourists wandering on foot into the bike path get hit or yelled at. Bicycle parking is not a matter of a few posts on the sidewalk, or bikes...
Ezra Klein calls out one of the most heartless aspects of our popular culture.
Can we now have a sensible discussion of how to control what is after all a real problem, and a bigger problem for poor and minority neighborhoods than for the rest of us?
I'll be addressing the West Los Angeles Political Action Committee at 2pm today under the title "A Progressive Agenda for Crime Control." The meeting is open to all comers.
Tens of thousands of innocent people rot in prison. Why doesn't that count as a law enforcement problem?
Since the assault weapons ban expired, AK-47s are showing up in the hands of criminals, and some of them are killing cops. Is this an issue for the Democrats? I'm not sure.
It's identity politics; it's a reaction to the negative identity politics of the gun-control groups; it's about self-reliance; and (in the form of hunting) it's the only form in which a manly man can practice nature-meditation.
If he's innocent, as seems to be the case, then what's the point of commuting his sentence to life without parole? If he doesn't belong on Death Row, he doesn't belong on an ordinary cellblock either.
Otherwise someone might be concerned that Davis is about to be executed for a crime he didn't commit.
Yes, getting the lead out of gasoline no doubt explains a large share, maybe even the bulk, of the crime drop from 1990-2005. But that doesn't meant that more and better police services didn't count. Only the liberal (and libertarian) Bourbons, who have learned nothing and forgotten nothing, still regard law enforcement as a bigger problem than crime.
Why concentrated enforcement is better than "equal-opportunity" enforcement.
Good idea. But it shouldn't cost thousands of dollars per parolee. Cellphone providers provide the same service to parents for $200 for the device and $20/mo.
Big banks and big information brokers willingly act as accessories to fraud against the elderly.
If you want to stop prison rape, ending the drug laws and privatizing prisons isn't the way to do it.
Mark is absolutely right in his posting below, about the way that new policing techniques allow America a way to dramatically reduce crime and in the process get out of our over-incarceration trap. It just so happens that Mark and I wrote an article seven years ago making pretty much the same point. I encourage the RBC's readers to take...
David Kennedy lays out what we now know how to do, and says it's time to start doing it. Democratic candidates, please copy.
It's easy to kill someone cleanly painlessly: put him in a room and replace the air in that room with an inert gas, such as nitrogen. So why do we insist on messy, painful means of execution?
If cell phones allow parents to track the whereabouts of their children, they can also allow community corrections officials to track the whereabouts of probationers, parolees, and people on pretrial release.
Open house in DC this Sunday from 1:30 on: 1020 16th Street, NW. Talk at the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Monday from 3:30-5: Landmark Building, Room 414A. Be there, or be square.
The more credible you make a threat, the smaller the risk of actually having to carry it out. That may be the key to having less crime and less punishment.
Looks as if the French socialists are making the same mistake the American Democrats made: they're handing the conservatives crime control as an issue.
I'll be giving a seminar at the National Institute of Justice this Thursday at 1 pm. Send me an email if you'd like to come.
Twenty Division I schools are trying to recruit a star high school football player who is also an armed robber.
The Feds seem to have lost a racketeering-murder conspiracy case on a technicality. But why can't the killers (who were New York City detectives at the time) be tried for murder under state law?
Violent crime has started to rise again. Maybe reducing federal aid to local law enforcement wasn't such a good idea after all.
How about sentencing Lay and Skilling to spend the rest of their lives doing hard, menial jobs and living in grinding poverty?
If Ken Lay doesn't want to die in jail, he'd better figure out someone more important than he is who has committed crimes Lay knows about. Do any names leap to mind? If so, you're as insanely partisan as I am.
I'm on FM 89.3 in LA tonight at 9 p.m., as part of a panel discussion of crime control.
I take issue with one piece of Mark's reflection on torture, which is his in-passing endorsement of the exclusionary rule. I think it's bad policy and bad law, mainly because maybe the guy is guilty, and putting him on the street is the wrong way to get the cops and DA's to act properly. Indeed, the "fruit of the poisonous...
The California Youth Authority has abandoned plans to take over Alcatraz for a young offenders holding facility....
Interviews with jurors in the Cory Maye case reinforce the idea that justice was ill-served at his trial; one of them was on so many "medications" for her "nerves" that she can't remember much of what happened. The jury system allows too many false convictions, and judges ought to be more vigilant than they are about overturning verdicts based on inadequate evidence.
/POMPOUS MORALIZING It looks as if a number of prominent Republicans are headed off to prison for various corrupt activities, and more are likely on the way, for corruption, election fraud, and outing Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA officer. No doubt they deserve it, and no doubt having them go away will encourage others to clean up their...
Looks to me as if he Starr was the bamboozlee, not the bamboozelor. And it also looks as if his client might actually not deserve to die.
An act can be voluntary even if made under pressure: that is, I can freely choose to accept a lesser evil rather than a greater. But to say, as the Abramoff plea agreement says, that "The defendant is entering into this agreement and is pleading guilty freely and voluntarily ... without threats, force, intimidation, or coercion of any kind," is transparently false. Why say it, then?
Tookie Williams was responsible for hundreds of murders, so I find it hard to mourn his death. But he might well have been innocent of the particular murders for which he was actually executed.
Radley Balko is still hammering on the Cory Maye case. But it's not getting any traction where it counts: in real politics and the mainstream media.
A criminal defendant has a right to defend himself in court, but not to have access to a law library to enable him to do so. Hilarious, isn't it?
No, bloggers can't save an innocent man, unless they can get actual reporters and actual politicians to pay attention.
An eighteen-year-old and two of his friends have sex with seventeen-year-old, who is too young to consent under Oregon law. She complains. The men aren't charged. The complainant is charged, and convicted, of making a false statement, on what seems like obviously deficient evidence.
A cop makes an innocent mistake. The cop winds up dead, and an equally innocent homeowner winds up on death row.
Forget what the offender deserves to have done to him. Concentrate on what the victim deserves to have done to the one who victimized him.
Below, Mark makes the argument, which I agree with, for the merits of retribution as a justification for punishment. The argument comes out of a deep aspect of human moral psychology, which is the need for public recognition of injustice. Human beings who are wronged, whether in small or large ways, need those who have committed wrong against them to...
His victims deserve to have him punished. Why is that a hard concept to grasp?
Jordan at Confined Space has been all over a truly nasty story that has yet to get the attention it deserves. It seems that immigration agents (who now work for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which combines the old Customs Service with the enforcement part of the former INS) have using purported "OSHA briefings" to catch illegal immigrants at work....
It looks as if the NYPD made a bunch of bad arrests and offered a stack of bad testimony in cases against the demonstrators at the RNC last summer. Can you say "perjury" and "evidence tampering" and "obstruction of justice"? I was sure you could.
At minimum, Wal-Mart has a corporate culture in which the No. 2 executive' story that he needed company cash for illegal union-bashing was convincing to his subordinates.