February 25th, 2012

The blogosphere is unnecessarily puzzled by Mitt Romney’s repeated claims, to audiences of Michigan Republicans, that

The trees are the right height.

I explained all this a fortnight ago. The question whether trees have the “right height” has meaning only for large, long-necked herbivores; in our day giraffes, in the Jurassic many different and much bigger sorts of sauropod dinosaur.

The Michigan white pine, pinus strobus, has a normal maximum height of around 45m, and the current record-holder reaches 56m. So it’s about half the presumptuous (and evolutionarily problematic) height of the Californian coast redwood. Young white pines are therefore just right - for brachiosaurs.

Vast, tiny-brained juggernauts, trampling their way through opposition by sheer mass towards their single hard-wired goal of hoovering up every vote leaf in sight and transforming them into mounds of poop.
Remind you of the Romney campaign?

9 Responses to “Why Michigan trees are the right height”

  1. Ed Whitney says:

    Too bad George Washington didn’t have the presence of mind to tell his father that he had chopped down the cherry tree because it was the wrong height.

  2. koreyel says:

    Until I hear otherwise from a historian who specializes in US elections:

    Romney holds the record for presidential campaign pandering.
    Like champagne bubbles, Romney panders.
    It just oozes relentlessly out of him.

    So much so, it’s a wonder his wife can stand him.

  3. jamie_2002 says:

    You should try living for an extended time in an unfamiliar landscape. You will understand what Romney means, even if he can’t express it well.

    If you have spent extended time in one type of forest, other forests look and feel wrong. It feels good to be in the forest, but it is unfamiliar at the same time. It is alienating in the other forests- something familiar is strange.

    I’ve seen the wrong kind of trees, the wrong kind of snow, the wrong kind of farms (crops tractors and barns), and the wrong kind of lakes. It sounds funny but it is very reassuring to see the right place. Romney was trying to convey that.

    Attack Romney because he is making the wrong kind of America- he will make everything right for the one percent, while claiming it is right for the middle class. (Just don’t call it alienating).

  4. Bloix says:

    Actually, the reason trees go tall is not in order to escape herbivores. It’s in order to be taller than other trees.

    Being tall has all sorts of disadvantages - you spend a huge amount of energy building a big wooden central column; you become more vulnerable to wind, and therefore you need to modify your root system to make youself more stable; you need to figure out how to get water and nutrients up and down over long distance. The only advantage you have is that you are taller than your neighbor, and therefore you get the sun and put him in the shade, rather than the other way around. Since sunlight is food, the tall trees eat and the shorter trees go hungry.

  5. DoctorMesmer says:

    The vividness of Mr. W.’s pieces and his lexical command often astonish me. Now he’s outdone himself: a juggernaut hoovering things up. Woot!

  6. DoctorMesmer says:

    Plenty of room! Indeed.