October 19th, 2011

… has clearly been Caligula’s horse Incitatus.

For close on two millennia the poor beast, the victim of his master’s insane (or perhaps jocular) intention to make him Consul, has been a proverb for those offered for posts beyond their capacities. Here, for example, is John Randolph of Roanoke on John Quincy Adams’s choice of Richard Rush as Secretary of the Treasury:

Never were abilities so much below mediocrity so well rewarded; no, not when Caligula’s horse was made Consul.

As a result of the Republican debates, we can now give the innocent Incitatus - who never, after all, ran for Consul, or even galloped for it - a rest. Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, and Santorum are all clearly less qualified for the office they seek than a horse would have been to serve as Consul. The Presidency, unlike the Consulate under the Emperors, still has real functions.

And at least Caligula proposed the entire horse.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “The big winner in the Republican debates …”

  1. Was somebody prepping for watching the debate by doing Sunday’s Google-a-day?

  2. J says:

    Mark, I know you’re just citing that quote for its rhetorical power. But in its context, it was a rather loathsome example of partisan invective not unlike the nonsense spewed by Fox News today. I’d hate to think that some 22nd-century blogger at the grandchild of RBC would quote Breitbart’s attack on Shirley Sherrod as a nice use of language.

    In reality, Richard Rush was a highly talented, experienced, and successful public servant who did a fine job running the Treasury. Meanwhile, John Randolph of Roanoke was admittedly a great orator, but an unpleasant and not particularly successful person in other respects, a self-proclaimed aristocrat who sneered at democracy and equality. Just as Mitch McConnell said that his first priority in the Senate is to ensure that Obama is a one-term president, Randolph’s response to the election of Quincy Adams was “It is my duty to leave nothing undone that I may lawfully do, to pull down this administration”. Inventing colorful but deeply inappropriate rhetorical attacks on JQA’s nominees was just part of that “duty”.

  3. Toby says:

    It was used in the 1930s when British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin appointed an obscure man named Sir Thomas Inskip as “Minsiter of Defence Co-ordination” in order to assuage fears that the UK was not doing doing enough to check the rise of Fascism. The appointment of such a cipher was intended to be seen as a gesture, and a sop to public opinion since the natural candidate was Winston Churchill.

    Wikipedia on Inskip:

    “When Inskip was named, one famous reaction was that “This is the most cynical appointment since Caligula made his horse a consul”.[8] His appointment is now regarded as a sign of caution by Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin who did not wish to appoint someone like Churchill, because it would have been interpreted by foreign powers as a sign of the United Kingdom preparing for war. Baldwin anyway wished to avoid taking onboard such a controversial and radical minister as Churchill”

  4. Allen K. says:

    Was Incitatus the one who always voted Neigh?