October 5th, 2011

Jon Caulkins, Angela Hawken, Beau Kilmer, and I just sent the manuscript of our cannabis-legalization book to Oxford, which promises to have physical books available in June. Same concept as Drugs and Drug Policy: question-and-answer format, minimal scholarly apparatus. We wind up breaking somewhat more new ground this time, just because we found more things to say that hadn’t already been said. There’s a voluminous literature on cannabis policy, but it’s overwhelmingly legalization advocacy rather than analysis.

During the month or so the Oxford copy-editor is fixing our prose, we’ll be sending out copies of the manuscript for comment. Let me know if you’d like one.

9 Responses to “Marijuana Legalization: What Everyone Needs to Know”

  1. Mark Killian says:

    I would love an opportunity to give this work a read. Please let me know if I can pay for postage or any other associated costs. Thanks!

  2. Brad says:

    Me too!. If being a Ph.D. psychophysiologist is an adequate qualification. Let me know if I also can pay postage or other costs.

    I’m wondering if you are sending out hard copy, or as word docs (the latter work as well).

    Thanks,

  3. daksya says:

    If it’s a soft copy, I’d like one as well. Thanks.

  4. Dennis says:

    If you’d like to have a statistician’s take on it, I’d love to take a look.

  5. Warren Drugs says:

    Why don’t you just send one to Pete Guither just in case.

  6. Tom Church says:

    Professor Kleiman,

    I’d love to take a look and give you feedback. I thoroughly enjoyed Drugs and Drug Policy, and I’m sure this one will be just as fascinating.

    Angela Hawken can vouch for me.

    -TC

  7. Swift Loris says:

    I’d love to read it and will happily pay any costs involved.

  8. gulo says:

    I’d gladly circulate among industry, legal, and environmental leaders on the North Coast. There are a few folks who think they know a thing or two about the demon weed up here. Can establish bona fides via email.

  9. Adrian says:

    I’ll take one if you’re interested in an ignorant practitioner’s take…