Really, this had no intended political point. When I saw the news photo, it struck me that Brooks had the hair-do and the supercilious look of one of a Restoration courtier.
Oops. I meant “tautology”. I understand “pleonasm” to be pleonastically the same thing. I must have been led astray by the appropriate associations of “moron”.
If News Corp. implodes, what will become of its aleptic nympholepts?
Mark, this is beneath you.
Nah, that’s what blogging is for. OTOH, that’s harsh.
There’s a definite similarity in the shape of the nose … she’s got a much better chin, though.
Too pointless to be harsh.
Oxymoronpleonasmtautology of the day: “disgraced News Corp. executive”. [Update abusing blogger privileges to confuse comment thread]Really, this had no intended political point. When I saw the news photo, it struck me that Brooks had the hair-do and the supercilious look of one of a Restoration courtier.
James, don’t you mean “pleonasm”?
King Charles looks more like Rowan Atkinson than Rebekah Brooks, to my eye.
Does this mean we should be living in fear of a Restoration?
Oops. I meant “tautology”. I understand “pleonasm” to be pleonastically the same thing. I must have been led astray by the appropriate associations of “moron”.
If News Corp. implodes, what will become of its aleptic nympholepts?
This is a total insult to Charles II!!