The radio programme on which Karen Hughe’s sidekick Colleen Graffy made the GITMO comment I posted about earlier wasn’t some little talk show in the boonies. It was the flagship twice-a-day Newshour programme of the English-language BBC World Service.
How many people does it reach? The weekly global audience for the World Service in English is 39 million. The BBC ran the item on other programmes; to my knowledge the high-profile domestic morning Today radio programme (about 6 million daily - only proles watch breakfast TV in Britain) and the struggling 24-hour TV news channel BBC World (no audience figures available). I assume the story also ran on the radio World Service in Arabic (12 million weekly) and Urdu (10 million), and probably in other languages. Let’s say the daily audience is half the weekly one and it only follows news. That gives a global audience for Ms Graffy’s sensitive public diplomacy of 35-40 million, nicely focused on wavering pro-Americans. To give perspective, Fox News’ most popular programme, The O’Reilly Factor, draws 2 million viewers a night.
Wait, it gets better-
http://www.unfogged.com/archives/week_2006_06_11.html#005050
1) One of the prisoners who killed himself was actually scheduled for release, he was classified as a “safe person”
2) He hadn’t been told this, however, because we couldn’t decide where to send him.
3) The general who called the suicides an act of asymmetrical warfare presumably knew about this classification- yet said anyway that a “safe person” was a “committed” terrorist, attacking the U.S. by killing himself.
Look at the good side. The only people who’d be PO’d by this are those who believe doubleplusungood ideas like suicide not being a terrorist attack.
The BBC news that runs on my local PBS station gave prominent play to a U.S. Army lawyer saying that the Gitmo Tribunals were “show trials.” In an interview, he allowed that he, personally, thought that his client had been tortured, and the evidence of that torture, disappeared.
I understand that Army lawyers are expected to be zealous advocates, but, still, I was a bit shocked, that he would go so far in flatly defaming the U.S. military, as much as they may deserve it.
This Administration makes me ashamed of my country.
Bruce, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if the military lawyers who are defending these guys have given up all hope of making high rank. At that point, especially since it would have been brought about by a moral failing of institutions that they intended to spend their careers supporting.
Sorry, I hit ‘post’ too early:
Bruce, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if the military lawyers who are defending these guys have given up all hope of making high rank. At that point, especially since it would have been brought about by a moral failing of institutions that they intended to spend their careers supporting, they don’t have much to lose. Their careers in the military are presumably dead-ended, and any career in the military-industrial complex is, as well.
At that point, going all-out makes sense.